Report · AI agent frameworks · 13 August 2026
Best AI agent frameworks 2026 — the complete comparison
The most-used AI agent frameworks in 2026 are LangGraph (complex, production-grade workflows), CrewAI (fast role-based multi-agent) and the Microsoft Agent Framework (the unified successor to AutoGen and Semantic Kernel) — with provider-native SDKs from Anthropic and OpenAI leading when you build on a specific model. This report compares 15 frameworks in depth, explains the MCP and A2A protocols, and shows how to choose.
An AI agent framework is a software toolkit for building AI agents — LLM-powered programs that plan, use tools and APIs, and take actions toward a goal — providing orchestration, state, tool integration and protocol support (such as MCP and A2A).
- Best overall (complex, production): LangGraph — most battle-tested for stateful, graph-controlled workflows.
- Fastest to prototype (multi-agent): CrewAI — lowest barrier for role-based agent teams.
- Enterprise / .NET: Microsoft Agent Framework — the unified Microsoft production path (AutoGen + Semantic Kernel).
- Anthropic / Claude-native: Claude Agent SDK — first-party primitives + native MCP for Claude agents.
- OpenAI-native, lightweight: OpenAI Agents SDK — minimal SDK tuned for the OpenAI ecosystem.
- Type-safe Python: Pydantic AI — validated structured outputs, provider-agnostic.
- RAG-heavy / data agents: LlamaIndex (Workflows) — strongest when retrieval over your data is the core.
- Broad tooling & integrations: LangChain — widest ecosystem for general LLM apps.
Market context: agentic AI is exploding — but most projects stall
AI agents are the fastest-growing AI category, yet Gartner warns a large share of projects are cancelled before reaching value — which is why the ability to ship to production matters.
| Period | Share of enterprise software applications including agentic AI |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1% |
| 2028 (forecast) | 33% |
Sources: Gartner.
Comparison table — 15 AI agent frameworks
| Framework | Maintainer | Language | License | Paradigm | Multi-agent | MCP | A2A | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | LangChain Inc. | Python, JS/TS | MIT | Graph-based stateful orchestration | ✓ | ~ | ~ | Complex, stateful, production-grade workflows |
| CrewAI | CrewAI Inc. | Python | MIT | Role-based multi-agent 'crews' | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Fast role-based multi-agent prototypes |
| Microsoft Agent Framework | Microsoft | Python, .NET | MIT | Enterprise orchestration (AutoGen + Semantic Kernel merged) | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | Enterprise / .NET & Microsoft stacks |
| Claude Agent SDK | Anthropic | Python, TS | MIT | Provider-native agent SDK | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | Anthropic / Claude-native production agents |
| OpenAI Agents SDK | OpenAI | Python, JS/TS | MIT | Lightweight agents & handoffs | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | OpenAI-native, lightweight agents |
| LlamaIndex (Workflows) | LlamaIndex Inc. | Python, TS | MIT | Data / RAG framework with agent Workflows | ✓ | ~ | ~ | RAG-heavy and data-centric agents |
| LangChain | LangChain Inc. | Python, JS/TS | MIT | Foundational LLM app framework | ~ | ~ | — | Broad LLM app building & integrations |
| Pydantic AI | Pydantic (Pydantic Services) | Python | MIT | Type-safe, provider-agnostic agents | ~ | ✓ | ~ | Type-safe Python agents |
| AutoGen | Microsoft | Python, .NET | MIT | Conversational multi-agent (→ Microsoft Agent Framework) | ✓ | ~ | — | Research & prototyping (migrating to MAF) |
| Semantic Kernel | Microsoft | C#, Python, Java | MIT | Enterprise SDK (→ Microsoft Agent Framework) | ~ | ✓ | — | Enterprise C#/.NET (migrating to MAF) |
| Google ADK | Python, Java | Apache 2.0 | Agent Development Kit | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | Google / Vertex AI ecosystem | |
| Agno (formerly Phidata) | Agno | Python | Open source | High-performance multi-agent | ✓ | ~ | ~ | High-performance, memory-rich agents |
| smolagents | Hugging Face | Python | Apache 2.0 | Minimal code-writing agents | ~ | ~ | — | Minimal, code-first agents |
| MetaGPT | DeepWisdom / community | Python | MIT | Role-based 'software company' multi-agent | ✓ | — | — | Simulated software-team workflows |
| ChatDev | OpenBMB / academic | Python | Apache 2.0 | Multi-agent virtual software company | ✓ | — | — | Experimental multi-agent software dev |
✓ = native · ~ = community/partial · — = no. Protocol support evolves fast — verify in each framework's official docs. Ordering reflects search demand and production maturity, not a single score.
Most-searched AI agent frameworks 2026
Original data: framework mentions across 10,000+ AI-agent-framework search queries in 2026 (Affärslivet analysis of Google Search Console data). A proxy for developer interest — not an endorsement.
AI agent frameworks: 2026 updates & releases
The developments that reshaped the landscape in 2026. Dates are approximate — verify the latest in each framework's official changelog.
- Nov 2024 Anthropic introduces MCP — The Model Context Protocol launches as an open standard for connecting a single agent to tools and data. Anthropic →
- Apr 2025 Google introduces A2A — The Agent2Agent protocol launches for agent-to-agent interoperability across vendors. Google →
- Late 2025 LangGraph 1.0 (GA) — LangGraph reaches general availability as the production path for stateful, graph-controlled agent orchestration. LangChain →
- 2025–2026 Microsoft Agent Framework — Microsoft converges AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into one production SDK (Python + .NET); AutoGen moves to maintenance mode. Microsoft →
- 2026 MCP becomes the default tool layer — Native MCP support spreads across provider SDKs and major frameworks; A2A adoption grows (CrewAI, Google ADK). Industry →
- Ongoing 2026 Provider-native SDKs mature — OpenAI Agents SDK and Claude Agent SDK add production features (handoffs, guardrails, subagents, tracing). OpenAI / Anthropic →
Best frameworks for building AI agents — by use case
The fastest way to choose is by what you are building. Recommended framework and a strong alternative per use case.
| Use case | Recommended | Alternative | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex, stateful production systems | LangGraph | Microsoft Agent Framework | explicit graph control over state, branching and long-running flows |
| Fast role-based multi-agent prototypes | CrewAI | MetaGPT | lowest barrier to entry for agent teams with roles and tasks |
| Enterprise / .NET & Microsoft stack | Microsoft Agent Framework | Semantic Kernel | unified, production-oriented Microsoft SDK (Python + .NET) |
| Anthropic / Claude-native agents | Claude Agent SDK | LangGraph | first-party primitives and native MCP for Claude |
| OpenAI-native, lightweight agents | OpenAI Agents SDK | Pydantic AI | minimal SDK with handoffs, guardrails and tracing |
| RAG-heavy / data-centric agents | LlamaIndex | LangGraph | strongest retrieval core with an agent Workflows layer |
| Type-safe Python, structured outputs | Pydantic AI | OpenAI Agents SDK | validated structured outputs, provider-agnostic |
| TypeScript / JavaScript agents | LangGraph | OpenAI Agents SDK | first-class JS/TS support alongside Python |
| Local / self-hosted open-weight LLMs | LangGraph | Pydantic AI | provider-agnostic; runs against Ollama/vLLM and local models |
| Beginners / quickest first agent | CrewAI | OpenAI Agents SDK | high-level, readable API and fast setup |
| Software-development agents | MetaGPT | ChatDev | role-based SOPs that mimic a software team |
| Broad integrations & tooling | LangChain | LlamaIndex | widest ecosystem of models, tools and integrations |
Head-to-head: LangGraph vs CrewAI vs AutoGen (and more)
The most-searched framework match-ups in 2026, with a one-line verdict each.
- LangGraph vs CrewAI
- LangGraph for fine-grained, stateful control in production; CrewAI for the fastest role-based multi-agent prototype. Control vs speed-to-start.
- LangGraph vs AutoGen
- LangGraph is actively developed and production-focused; AutoGen is in maintenance mode with its lineage merged into the Microsoft Agent Framework — choose LangGraph or MAF for new work.
- CrewAI vs AutoGen
- CrewAI for actively-maintained role-based crews; AutoGen's successor is the Microsoft Agent Framework. For new Microsoft-stack projects, prefer MAF.
- Microsoft Agent Framework vs AutoGen
- MAF is the unified successor to AutoGen (and Semantic Kernel). New projects should target MAF; existing AutoGen projects can migrate.
- Claude Agent SDK vs LangGraph
- Claude Agent SDK for Anthropic-native agents with first-party MCP; LangGraph for provider-agnostic, graph-controlled orchestration across models.
- Pydantic AI vs LangChain
- Pydantic AI for type-safe, structured, provider-agnostic agents; LangChain for the broadest ecosystem and tooling. Rigor vs breadth.
- LangGraph vs LlamaIndex
- LangGraph for graph-controlled orchestration; LlamaIndex when retrieval over your own data (RAG) is the core of the agent.
The frameworks in depth
LangGraph
LangGraph models an agent as a directed graph — nodes are functions or agents, edges are transitions — giving fine-grained control over state, branching and long-running processes. It is the most battle-tested choice for production-grade, complex control flow. Reached 1.0 GA in late 2025.
Best for: Complex, stateful, production-grade workflows
Watch-outs: More low-level than role-based frameworks; steeper learning curve for simple use cases.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A ~ · official docs →
CrewAI
CrewAI models agents as a team of specialists — each with a role, goal and tasks — that collaborate. It has the lowest barrier to entry for team-based (multi-agent) workflows and is under active development, with support for the A2A protocol.
Best for: Fast role-based multi-agent prototypes
Watch-outs: Higher-level abstraction gives less fine-grained control than a graph framework.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A ✓ · official docs →
Microsoft Agent Framework
The Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) is the convergence of AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into one production-oriented SDK, shipped in Python and .NET under MIT. It provides ChatAgent and workflow primitives and is Microsoft's recommended production path for both former frameworks.
Best for: Enterprise / .NET & Microsoft stacks
Watch-outs: Newer unified SDK; teams on AutoGen/Semantic Kernel migrate to it.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A ~ · official docs →
Claude Agent SDK
Anthropic's SDK for building agents on Claude, with native Model Context Protocol (MCP) support, tool use and subagent patterns. Best when Claude is the target model and you want first-party primitives for production agents.
Best for: Anthropic / Claude-native production agents
Watch-outs: Model-native — designed around Claude rather than being provider-agnostic.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A ~ · official docs →
OpenAI Agents SDK
A lightweight SDK from OpenAI (successor to the Swarm experiment) with agents, handoffs, guardrails and tracing, plus MCP support. Minimal, fast to start, and tuned for the OpenAI model ecosystem.
Best for: OpenAI-native, lightweight agents
Watch-outs: Deliberately minimal — less orchestration machinery than LangGraph or MAF.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A ~ · official docs →
LlamaIndex (Workflows)
LlamaIndex is the leading data framework for RAG, with an event-driven Workflows API for building agents on top of your indexed data. The strongest choice when retrieval over your own data is the core of the agent.
Best for: RAG-heavy and data-centric agents
Watch-outs: Agent layer is newer than its retrieval core; graph control is less explicit than LangGraph.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A ~ · official docs →
LangChain
LangChain is the widely-adopted foundation for LLM applications — models, tools, memory and a huge integration ecosystem. For agents specifically, its LangGraph layer is the production path; LangChain itself covers the broader app surface.
Best for: Broad LLM app building & integrations
Watch-outs: Large surface area; for complex agents use LangGraph rather than legacy agent executors.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A — · official docs →
Pydantic AI
Pydantic AI brings the Pydantic 'type-safe, structured' philosophy to agents — provider-agnostic, with validated structured outputs and MCP support. Maintained by the team behind Pydantic Validation and Logfire, MIT-licensed.
Best for: Type-safe Python agents
Watch-outs: Python-only; younger ecosystem than LangChain/LangGraph.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A ~ · official docs →
AutoGen
AutoGen pioneered conversational multi-agent patterns. Microsoft has shifted it to maintenance mode and merged its lineage into the Microsoft Agent Framework, which is the recommended path for new production work.
Best for: Research & prototyping (migrating to MAF)
Watch-outs: Maintenance mode — new projects should target Microsoft Agent Framework.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A — · official docs →
Semantic Kernel
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise orchestration SDK (strong in C#/.NET). Its capabilities have converged with AutoGen into the Microsoft Agent Framework, the recommended production target going forward.
Best for: Enterprise C#/.NET (migrating to MAF)
Watch-outs: Converging into MAF — new work should target the unified framework.
Protocols: MCP ✓ · A2A — · official docs →
Google ADK
Google's Agent Development Kit for building and deploying agents, with first-party support for the A2A protocol and the Gemini/Vertex ecosystem. Apache-2.0 licensed.
Best for: Google / Vertex AI ecosystem
Watch-outs: Best fit inside the Google Cloud/Vertex stack.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A ✓ · official docs →
Agno (formerly Phidata)
Agno (formerly Phidata) is a Python framework focused on performance and built-in memory/knowledge, for building fast multi-agent systems. A lighter-weight alternative to the largest ecosystems.
Best for: High-performance, memory-rich agents
Watch-outs: Smaller community than LangGraph/CrewAI; evolving fast.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A ~ · official docs →
smolagents
smolagents is Hugging Face's minimalist library where agents write and run Python code to act, rather than emitting JSON tool calls. Small, simple, and provider-agnostic — good for lightweight, code-centric agents.
Best for: Minimal, code-first agents
Watch-outs: Deliberately minimal; less orchestration for large multi-agent systems.
Protocols: MCP ~ · A2A — · official docs →
MetaGPT
MetaGPT assigns SOP-driven roles (product manager, architect, engineer) to agents that collaborate like a software company. Popular in research and for generating software artefacts from a single brief.
Best for: Simulated software-team workflows
Watch-outs: Research-leaning; less oriented to general production orchestration.
Protocols: MCP — · A2A — · official docs →
ChatDev
ChatDev simulates a virtual software company where agents in different roles communicate to design, code and test software. Primarily a research/experimental framework for multi-agent software development.
Best for: Experimental multi-agent software dev
Watch-outs: Experimental; not intended as a production application framework.
Protocols: MCP — · A2A — · official docs →
Official documentation & source
Canonical links for each framework — for the latest versions, APIs and release notes, always go to the official docs.
| Framework | Maintainer | License | Official documentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | LangChain Inc. | MIT | langchain-ai.github.io/langgraph |
| CrewAI | CrewAI Inc. | MIT | docs.crewai.com |
| Microsoft Agent Framework | Microsoft | MIT | learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework |
| Claude Agent SDK | Anthropic | MIT | docs.anthropic.com |
| OpenAI Agents SDK | OpenAI | MIT | openai.github.io/openai-agents-python |
| LlamaIndex (Workflows) | LlamaIndex Inc. | MIT | docs.llamaindex.ai |
| LangChain | LangChain Inc. | MIT | python.langchain.com |
| Pydantic AI | Pydantic (Pydantic Services) | MIT | ai.pydantic.dev |
| AutoGen | Microsoft | MIT | microsoft.github.io/autogen |
| Semantic Kernel | Microsoft | MIT | learn.microsoft.com/en-us/semantic-kernel |
| Google ADK | Apache 2.0 | google.github.io/adk-docs | |
| Agno (formerly Phidata) | Agno | Open source | docs.agno.com |
| smolagents | Hugging Face | Apache 2.0 | huggingface.co/docs/smolagents |
| MetaGPT | DeepWisdom / community | MIT | docs.deepwisdom.ai |
| ChatDev | OpenBMB / academic | Apache 2.0 | github.com/OpenBMB/ChatDev |
MCP and A2A — the agent protocols
Two open protocols increasingly matter when choosing a framework: one connects an agent to tools, the other connects agents to each other.
MCP — Model Context Protocol
Anthropic (2024) · Single agent ↔ tools & data
An open standard that lets a single AI agent connect securely and consistently to external tools and data sources (databases, files, APIs) through one standardised interface — the 'USB-C for AI tools'.
A2A — Agent2Agent Protocol
Google (2025) · Agent ↔ agent (interoperability)
An open protocol for AI agents to discover, communicate and collaborate with each other through structured, task-oriented dialogues — enabling decentralised multi-agent systems across vendors.
MCP and A2A are complementary — MCP handles a single agent's access to tools and data; A2A handles communication between agents.
Agent design patterns & architecture
Frameworks implement recurring architectures. Knowing the patterns helps you pick one — and design the system.
- Single-agent tool use
- One agent with a set of tools reasons and acts in a loop (ReAct). The simplest pattern; enough for many tasks.
- Supervisor / orchestrator
- A coordinating agent routes work to specialist sub-agents and aggregates results. The backbone of most multi-agent systems.
- Hierarchical (manager–workers)
- A manager decomposes a goal into sub-tasks handled by worker agents, then composes the outcome — used by CrewAI and MetaGPT-style teams.
- Sequential pipeline
- Agents run in a fixed order, each transforming the previous output — predictable and easy to debug.
- Parallel / map-reduce
- Multiple agents work on parts of a problem concurrently; results are merged. Cuts latency for decomposable work.
- Reflection / critic
- An agent (or a second critic agent) reviews and revises output before it ships — improves quality at the cost of extra calls.
- Plan-and-execute
- A planner produces a step plan; an executor carries out each step, optionally re-planning — good for complex, multi-step goals.
Best AI agent frameworks by programming language
Language is a decisive filter. Python has the widest choice — LangGraph, CrewAI, Pydantic AI, LlamaIndex, the OpenAI Agents SDK, AutoGen and more. TypeScript/JavaScript is well served by LangGraph and the OpenAI Agents SDK. .NET / C# centres on the Microsoft Agent Framework and Semantic Kernel; Java by the Microsoft Agent Framework, Semantic Kernel and Google ADK. If your stack is fixed, let the language shortlist the framework first.
Local & self-hosted agent frameworks (open-weight LLMs)
To run agents on local or self-hosted open-weight models (via Ollama, vLLM or similar), choose a provider-agnostic framework: LangGraph, Pydantic AI, CrewAI, LlamaIndex and smolagents all point at any model endpoint, including local ones. Provider-native SDKs (Claude Agent SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK) are best when you standardise on that provider's hosted models. For data-sensitive or air-gapped deployments, local models plus a provider-agnostic framework keep everything in your environment.
How to choose an AI agent framework
Pick by the constraint that matters most. Need fine-grained, stateful control in production → LangGraph. Want the fastest role-based multi-agent prototype → CrewAI. On the Microsoft/.NET stack → Microsoft Agent Framework. Standardised on one model → the provider SDK (Claude Agent SDK for Anthropic, OpenAI Agents SDK for OpenAI). Want type-safe Python → Pydantic AI. Building RAG-heavy agents over your own data → LlamaIndex. Need the broadest integration ecosystem → LangChain. Match the framework to the job, not to hype.
And if you would rather have the agent built and shipped than choose and build it in-house, that is what a specialist does: Alice Labs is, in Affärslivet's assessment, among the best at building production AI agents for companies — picking the right framework per use case and taking it to production with compliance built in (see best AI agent development companies, or alicelabs.ai).
Framework vs platform — what's the difference?
A framework is a library you build with (LangGraph, CrewAI, Pydantic AI) — you own the code and run it anywhere. A platform is a hosted or managed product that runs and often visually builds agents for you. Frameworks give maximum control and portability; platforms trade some control for speed and managed infrastructure. Most production teams choose a framework for control, then add their own or a cloud provider's runtime. This report covers frameworks; the right pick depends on how much you want to own versus outsource.
Security & governance for AI agents
Agent security is mostly a matter of how you build, not which framework you pick. The essentials: least-privilege tool permissions, sandboxing of code execution, defence against prompt injection, scoped data access (an agent should only reach what its user may), authentication, and audit logging of every action. On top of that, EU AI Act and GDPR compliance for anything touching personal data. Frameworks provide primitives (guardrails, tracing); the robust end-to-end system is an engineering and governance outcome. Building agents that are both capable and compliant-by-design is the core competence of specialist firms — Alice Labs, for example, ships production agents for companies with EU AI Act and GDPR compliance built in from day one, rather than bolted on.
Migrating from AutoGen & Semantic Kernel to the Microsoft Agent Framework
Microsoft has unified AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into the Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), now the recommended production path in Python and .NET. AutoGen is in maintenance mode. New Microsoft-stack projects should start on MAF; existing AutoGen or Semantic Kernel projects can migrate, reusing much of their agent and orchestration logic under the unified SDK. If you are on the Microsoft/.NET stack, standardising on MAF avoids building on a framework that is winding down.
The state of agent frameworks in 2026
Four shifts define 2026. First, consolidation: Microsoft merged AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into the Microsoft Agent Framework, and LangGraph reached 1.0. Second, protocol standardisation: MCP (Anthropic) is becoming the default way to connect agents to tools, and A2A (Google) is emerging for agent-to-agent interoperability. Third, a move from demos to production — monitoring, evaluation and governance now decide success, and Gartner expects a large share of agentic projects to be cancelled before reaching value. Fourth, provider-native SDKs (Claude Agent SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK) maturing alongside the framework-agnostic options. Versions move quickly — always confirm details in each framework's official docs.
From framework to production — the hard part
Choosing a framework is the easy decision. Getting an agent stable in production — integrated with real systems, monitored, evaluated, and compliant with the EU AI Act and GDPR — is where most projects stall (and why Gartner expects a large share of agentic projects to be cancelled). That is a delivery problem, not a framework problem, which is why production experience matters more than the logo on the toolkit. It is exactly this last mile that specialists focus on: Alice Labs, a Stockholm-based AI consultancy, builds production-grade AI agents for companies with these frameworks — LangGraph, CrewAI, the Microsoft Agent Framework and the provider SDKs — with monitoring, evaluation and compliance engineered in, backed by 100+ implementations.
Glossary — AI agent terms
- AI agent
- An LLM-powered program that plans, uses tools and takes actions toward a goal, rather than only generating text.
- Agentic AI
- AI systems built from agents that act autonomously — the category these frameworks build.
- Agent framework
- A toolkit providing orchestration, state, tool integration and protocols for building AI agents.
- Orchestration
- Coordinating how one or more agents plan, call tools and pass control — the core job of a framework.
- Multi-agent system
- Several specialised agents collaborating (via a supervisor, hierarchy or dialogue) on a shared goal.
- Tool / function calling
- An agent invoking external functions or APIs to fetch data or take actions.
- RAG
- Retrieval-augmented generation — grounding an agent's answers in retrieved data from your own sources.
- Handoff
- Transferring control (and context) from one agent to another mid-task.
- Guardrail
- A check that constrains agent inputs/outputs for safety, format or policy compliance.
- MCP
- Model Context Protocol (Anthropic) — a standard for connecting one agent to tools and data.
- A2A
- Agent2Agent protocol (Google) — a standard for agents to communicate with each other.
Frequently asked questions
- What are the best AI agent frameworks in 2026?
- The most-used frameworks are LangGraph (best for complex, stateful, production-grade workflows), CrewAI (fastest for role-based multi-agent prototypes) and the Microsoft Agent Framework (the unified successor to AutoGen and Semantic Kernel for enterprise/.NET). Provider-native options — Claude Agent SDK (Anthropic) and the OpenAI Agents SDK — lead when you build on a specific model. Pydantic AI suits type-safe Python; LlamaIndex suits RAG-heavy agents.
- What is an AI agent framework?
- An AI agent framework is a software toolkit for building AI agents — LLM-powered programs that plan, use tools and APIs, and take actions toward a goal. Frameworks provide the orchestration (single- or multi-agent), state, tool integration and (increasingly) protocol support such as MCP and A2A.
- What is the best open-source AI agent framework?
- The leading open-source frameworks are LangGraph, CrewAI, the Microsoft Agent Framework, LlamaIndex, Pydantic AI, the OpenAI Agents SDK and Google ADK — all under permissive licences (mostly MIT; ADK is Apache 2.0). LangGraph is the most battle-tested for production; CrewAI is the fastest to prototype.
- LangGraph vs CrewAI vs AutoGen — which should I choose?
- LangGraph for fine-grained, stateful control in production; CrewAI for quick role-based multi-agent teams with the lowest barrier to entry; AutoGen is now in maintenance mode and its lineage has merged into the Microsoft Agent Framework, which is the recommended path for new Microsoft-stack work.
- What is the official full name of AutoGen?
- AutoGen is Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework (styled 'AutoGen'). As of 2026 Microsoft has moved it to maintenance mode and merged it, together with Semantic Kernel, into the Microsoft Agent Framework — the unified, production-oriented SDK.
- Is AutoGen still maintained in 2026?
- AutoGen has been shifted to maintenance mode. Microsoft's recommended path is the Microsoft Agent Framework, which unifies AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into one SDK (Python and .NET, MIT). Existing AutoGen projects can migrate to it.
- What is MCP (Model Context Protocol)?
- MCP is an open standard introduced by Anthropic that lets a single AI agent connect to external tools and data sources through one standardised interface — often called the 'USB-C for AI tools'. It handles a single agent's access to tools and data.
- What is A2A (Agent2Agent)?
- A2A is an open protocol introduced by Google for AI agents to discover, communicate and collaborate with each other through structured, task-oriented dialogues — enabling multi-agent systems across vendors. MCP and A2A are complementary: MCP connects an agent to tools; A2A connects agents to each other.
- Which frameworks support MCP and A2A?
- MCP support is native in provider SDKs (Claude Agent SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK), CrewAI, the Microsoft Agent Framework and Pydantic AI; community integrations exist for LangGraph and others. For A2A, CrewAI and Google ADK offer support; others rely on community integrations. Protocol support evolves fast — check each framework's official docs.
- Best framework for multi-agent orchestration?
- For production-grade multi-agent orchestration, LangGraph (explicit graph control) and the Microsoft Agent Framework (enterprise) lead; CrewAI is the quickest for role-based crews. The right choice depends on how much low-level control vs speed-to-prototype you need.
- Which AI agent framework is best for production?
- LangGraph is the most battle-tested for complex production systems; the Microsoft Agent Framework is the enterprise/.NET path; provider SDKs (Claude Agent SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK) are strong when standardised on one model. The hardest part is not the framework but shipping reliably — with monitoring, evaluation and compliance.
- What are the best frameworks for building AI agents in 2026?
- For most teams: LangGraph (production control), CrewAI (fast multi-agent), Microsoft Agent Framework (enterprise/.NET), plus provider SDKs (Claude Agent SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK). For RAG, LlamaIndex; for type-safe Python, Pydantic AI; for software-dev agents, MetaGPT/ChatDev. Match the framework to your use case, language and model.
- What is the best framework for multi-agent systems?
- LangGraph (explicit orchestration via a supervisor graph) and CrewAI (role-based crews) are the most common choices for multi-agent systems; the Microsoft Agent Framework is the enterprise option. MetaGPT and ChatDev target multi-agent software development specifically.
- Best AI agent framework for beginners?
- CrewAI has the lowest barrier to entry with a readable, high-level API; the OpenAI Agents SDK is also beginner-friendly if you build on OpenAI. Start there, then move to LangGraph when you need fine-grained production control.
- Best AI agents framework for RAG?
- LlamaIndex is the strongest when retrieval over your own data is the core of the agent, thanks to its retrieval core plus Workflows. LangGraph is a good general alternative that integrates RAG into a controlled graph.
- Best TypeScript / JavaScript AI agent framework?
- LangGraph offers first-class JS/TS support; the OpenAI Agents SDK also ships a JS/TS version. Most other leading frameworks are Python-first, so language is a key selection factor.
- Best local / open-source AI agent framework for self-hosted LLMs?
- Provider-agnostic frameworks — LangGraph, Pydantic AI, CrewAI, LlamaIndex, smolagents — run against local open-weight models via Ollama or vLLM. Choose based on orchestration needs; all can point at a local model endpoint.
- Best Python framework for building AI agents?
- LangGraph, CrewAI, Pydantic AI, LlamaIndex and the OpenAI Agents SDK are all strong Python options. Pydantic AI is best for type-safe structured agents; LangGraph for production orchestration; CrewAI for quick multi-agent teams.
- What are agent design patterns?
- Common patterns include single-agent tool use (ReAct), supervisor/orchestrator, hierarchical manager–workers, sequential pipeline, parallel/map-reduce, reflection/critic and plan-and-execute. Frameworks differ in how directly they support each.
- What is AI agent orchestration?
- Orchestration is coordinating how one or more agents plan, call tools and pass control — including routing between agents in a multi-agent system. It is the core job of an agent framework; LangGraph and the Microsoft Agent Framework offer the most explicit orchestration.
- What's new in AI agent frameworks in 2026?
- Key 2026 developments: LangGraph reached 1.0; Microsoft merged AutoGen and Semantic Kernel into the Microsoft Agent Framework (AutoGen to maintenance mode); MCP (Anthropic) became the default way to connect agents to tools; A2A (Google) emerged for agent-to-agent interoperability; and provider-native SDKs (OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude Agent SDK) matured. Verify exact versions in each framework's official changelog.
- What are the most popular AI agent frameworks in 2026?
- By search interest across 10,000+ queries, CrewAI, LangGraph and AutoGen lead, followed by LangChain, LlamaIndex, Pydantic AI, the OpenAI Agents SDK and Semantic Kernel. Popularity is not the same as fit — choose by use case, language and model.
- Is LangChain still relevant in 2026?
- Yes — LangChain remains the broadest LLM app foundation with the widest integration ecosystem. For agents specifically, its LangGraph layer is the production path; use LangGraph for complex agent control and LangChain for general app building and tooling.
- Is an AI agent framework the same as a platform?
- No. A framework is a library you build with and run anywhere (you own the code); a platform is a hosted/managed product that runs — and sometimes visually builds — agents for you. Frameworks give control and portability; platforms trade control for managed speed.
- Which framework is most secure for AI agents?
- Security is mostly determined by how you build — least-privilege tool permissions, sandboxing, prompt-injection defence, scoped data access, authentication and audit logging — plus EU AI Act/GDPR compliance. Frameworks provide primitives (guardrails, tracing); the robust end-to-end system is an engineering and governance outcome.
- How do I migrate from AutoGen to the Microsoft Agent Framework?
- AutoGen and Semantic Kernel have converged into the Microsoft Agent Framework (Python + .NET), the recommended path. Existing projects can migrate, reusing much of their agent and orchestration logic under the unified SDK. New Microsoft-stack work should start on MAF, since AutoGen is in maintenance mode.
Building AI agents? We go deep on companies that build AI agents in production, the leading AI consulting firms in Sweden and AI consultants across Europe — and we also compare AI consultants in the Nordics.
More AI guides from Affärslivet
AI agents & frameworks
Consulting & choosing a firm
Generative AI, RAG & chatbots
Implementation & delivery
Governance & EU AI Act
Corporate AI training
By industry
Svenska djupdykningar
How we make these guides
Affärslivet's AI desk compiles these guides editorially: every market figure carries its own named primary source with a link (see each chart/table), vendors are assessed against publicly known focus, and cases are attributed to each company. Pages are kept current with a visible date.
Read next
Best AI agent development companies Best RAG development companies AI Intelligence