Affärslivet

Affärslivet composite index · 4 dimensions · World Bank data

Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026

The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on trade strength across 4 equal-weighted dimensions. Singapore leads (76.5/100); Sweden ranks 19th. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.

TL;DRSingapore leads the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 with 76.5/100.

World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 898 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON

76.5/100Top (Singapore)composite score
19thSweden's rankof 49 economies
27.7/100Sweden's scorecomposite
4Dimensionsequal-weighted
49Economies ranked≥3 dimensions
CC BY 4.0Licencefree to reuse

Executive summary

The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on trade strength by combining 4 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. In a world of shifting supply chains and trade tension, this index captures which economies are built to win from global commerce. Singapore leads with 76.5/100; Sweden ranks 19th of 49 with 27.7/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Key findings

0176.5/100of 49 economies

Singapore leads on trade strength

Singapore tops the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 with a composite score of 76.5/100. Top five: Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam, Switzerland.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

0219thscore 27.7/100

Where Sweden ranks

Sweden ranks 19th of 49 (27.7/100). Strongest dimension: surplus (55.3/100); weakest: reserves (1.8/100).

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

034 measuresOpenness, Surplus, High-tech, Reserves

The dimensions

The index combines openness, surplus, export sophistication, reserves — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High

Data vintage — August 2026

Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.

The index — top economies

The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 4 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.

Sweden, dimension by dimension

Sweden ranks 19th of 49 overall (27.7/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish trade strength is genuinely strong and where it lags.

Sweden's profile is relatively lopsided (a 54-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on surplus and lowest on reserves.

DimensionScore /100Rank
Openness (exports, % of GDP)25.314th of 48
Surplus (current account, % of GDP)55.310th of 49
Export sophistication (high-tech)28.326th of 49
Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves)1.832nd of 49

Who leads each dimension

No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Singapore) leads by being strong across the board (a 89-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.

DimensionWorld leaderScore /100
Openness (exports, % of GDP)Singapore100.0
Surplus (current account, % of GDP)Ireland100.0
Export sophistication (high-tech)Philippines100.0
Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves)China100.0

Regional patterns

Median composite score by world region reveals where trade strength concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.

RegionEconomiesMedian scoreRegional leader
Asia-Pacific1232.8Singapore (76.5)
Europe2323.9Ireland (66.3)
Americas713.7United States (23.3)
Middle East & Africa713.0United Arab Emirates (41.9)

What the index reveals

What the data says: Singapore leads with 76.5/100, 3.5× the median score of 21.6. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows trade strength is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.

For Sweden, the index indicates a middling position on trade strength: 19th of 49 (27.7/100), strongest on surplus and with most room to improve on reserves.

Top 5 vs bottom 5

The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.

Top 5Score /100Bottom 5Score /100
1. Singapore76.545. Colombia10.0
2. Ireland66.346. Romania9.6
3. China48.847. Argentina9.0
4. Viet Nam45.848. Egypt7.0
5. Switzerland43.949. Ukraine4.9

How the index is built

The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index ranks economies on their strength as traders — how open they are, whether they run external surpluses, how sophisticated their exports are, and the reserves that back their external position.

Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.

DimensionDirectionWorld Bank series
Openness (exports, % of GDP)higher = betterNE.EXP.GNFS.ZS
Surplus (current account, % of GDP)higher = betterBN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS
Export sophistication (high-tech)higher = betterTX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS
Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves)higher = betterFI.RES.TOTL.CD

Full ranking — 49 economies

Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.

#CountryIndexOpennessSurplusHigh-techReserves
1Singapore76.5100.097.397.411.3
2Ireland66.377.4100.087.70.2
3China48.86.146.342.6100.0
4Viet Nam45.852.356.472.32.1
5Switzerland43.940.258.948.128.5
6Malaysia43.436.038.196.13.2
7United Arab Emirates41.957.588.513.97.6
8Norway37.620.686.541.22.1
9Netherlands37.541.867.437.92.9
10South Korea37.220.857.359.111.5
11Denmark36.635.479.528.33.2
12Thailand32.936.142.345.97.3
13Philippines32.69.318.2100.02.8
14Iceland30.917.517.788.40.0
15Japan30.46.650.628.136.5
16Israel28.49.936.960.75.9
17Hungary28.236.937.936.51.4
18Germany27.717.749.228.815.1
19Sweden27.725.355.328.31.8
20Czechia27.033.533.936.24.5
21Belgium24.138.623.832.81.3
22Austria23.926.238.529.61.2
23United States23.30.017.139.336.8
24France23.113.430.337.411.2
25United Kingdom21.611.821.847.55.5
26India21.26.829.729.818.5
27Mexico21.117.229.631.06.6
28Poland20.023.427.921.57.1
29Italy19.812.735.919.411.4
30Spain19.015.443.014.53.2
31Russia18.44.338.015.216.1
32Nigeria18.350.43.61.0
33Portugal17.819.639.610.31.6
34Australia17.77.420.840.71.7
35Finland17.618.836.714.50.4
36Canada17.512.227.626.93.2
37Indonesia13.97.131.013.54.0
38Chile13.714.126.612.91.1
39South Africa13.012.229.78.51.8
40Brazil12.74.119.917.59.4
41Turkiye12.38.328.47.64.8
42New Zealand11.68.217.120.60.5
43Saudi Arabia11.411.221.30.013.3
44Greece11.217.13.423.90.4
45Colombia10.02.422.014.01.6
46Romania9.614.70.221.42.2
47Argentina9.02.727.05.50.9
48Egypt7.05.316.35.41.1
49Ukraine4.98.60.09.61.3

Limitations & what the index can't tell you

This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).

The index measures the dimensions of trade strength that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.

Scoreboard (machine-readable data)

Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.

↓ CSV · ↓ JSON

IndicatorValuePeriodSourceConf.
Singapore76.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Ireland66.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
China48.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Viet Nam45.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Switzerland43.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Malaysia43.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Arab Emirates41.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Norway37.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Netherlands37.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Korea37.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Denmark36.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Thailand32.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Philippines32.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Iceland30.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Japan30.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Israel28.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Hungary28.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Germany27.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Sweden27.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Czechia27 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Belgium24.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Austria23.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United States23.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
France23.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Kingdom21.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
India21.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Mexico21.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Poland20 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Italy19.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Spain19 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Russia18.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Nigeria18.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Portugal17.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Australia17.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Finland17.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Canada17.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Indonesia13.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Chile13.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Africa13 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Brazil12.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Turkiye12.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
New Zealand11.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Saudi Arabia11.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Greece11.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Colombia10 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Romania9.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Argentina9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Egypt7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Ukraine4.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High

Methodology & verification

The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 equal-weights 4 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.

Data dictionary

FieldTypeDescription
metricstringtrade_powerhouse_index
labelstringCountry name
valuenumberComposite score, 0–100
unitstring/100
geographystringCountry

Frequently asked questions

What is the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026?

A composite ranking of 49 economies on trade strength, combining 4 World Bank dimensions (Openness, Surplus, High-tech, Reserves), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.

Which country ranks first?

Singapore leads with 76.5/100. Top five: Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam, Switzerland.

Where does Sweden rank?

Sweden ranks 19th of 49 with 27.7/100, strongest on surplus.

How is it calculated?

Each of 4 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.

Is this an official index?

No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.

Can I download the data?

Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.

Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Trade Powerhouse Index?

The top five are Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam and Switzerland, based on the Trade Powerhouse Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).

Where does Sweden rank in the Trade Powerhouse Index?

Sweden ranks #19 of 49 (27.7) in the Trade Powerhouse Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.

How many countries are ranked in the Trade Powerhouse Index?

49 economies are included in the Trade Powerhouse Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Glossary

Composite index
A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 4 normalised dimensions.
Min-max normalisation
Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted.
Openness
Dimension of the index — World Bank series NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (higher is better).
Surplus
Dimension of the index — World Bank series BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS (higher is better).
Export sophistication
Dimension of the index — World Bank series TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS (higher is better).
Reserves
Dimension of the index — World Bank series FI.RES.TOTL.CD (higher is better).

Embed & cite this report

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.

Embed (HTML) — auto-updating

<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/trade-powerhouse-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index">Affärslivet</a></p>

APA

Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index

MLA

Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index.

BibTeX

@techreport{affarslivet_trade_powerhouse_index,
  title  = {Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026},
  author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Version 1.0},
  url    = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index}
}

License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.

Sources