Affärslivet composite index · 4 dimensions · World Bank data
Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026
The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on trade strength across 4 equal-weighted dimensions. Singapore leads (76.5/100); Sweden ranks 19th. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.
TL;DR — Singapore leads the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 with 76.5/100.
World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 898 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON
Executive summary
The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on trade strength by combining 4 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. In a world of shifting supply chains and trade tension, this index captures which economies are built to win from global commerce. Singapore leads with 76.5/100; Sweden ranks 19th of 49 with 27.7/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Key findings
Singapore leads on trade strength
Singapore tops the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 with a composite score of 76.5/100. Top five: Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam, Switzerland.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
Where Sweden ranks
Sweden ranks 19th of 49 (27.7/100). Strongest dimension: surplus (55.3/100); weakest: reserves (1.8/100).
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
The dimensions
The index combines openness, surplus, export sophistication, reserves — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High
Data vintage — August 2026
Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.
The index — top economies
The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 4 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.
Sweden, dimension by dimension
Sweden ranks 19th of 49 overall (27.7/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish trade strength is genuinely strong and where it lags.
Sweden's profile is relatively lopsided (a 54-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on surplus and lowest on reserves.
| Dimension | Score /100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Openness (exports, % of GDP) | 25.3 | 14th of 48 |
| Surplus (current account, % of GDP) | 55.3 | 10th of 49 |
| Export sophistication (high-tech) | 28.3 | 26th of 49 |
| Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves) | 1.8 | 32nd of 49 |
Who leads each dimension
No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Singapore) leads by being strong across the board (a 89-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.
| Dimension | World leader | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|
| Openness (exports, % of GDP) | Singapore | 100.0 |
| Surplus (current account, % of GDP) | Ireland | 100.0 |
| Export sophistication (high-tech) | Philippines | 100.0 |
| Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves) | China | 100.0 |
Regional patterns
Median composite score by world region reveals where trade strength concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.
| Region | Economies | Median score | Regional leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia-Pacific | 12 | 32.8 | Singapore (76.5) |
| Europe | 23 | 23.9 | Ireland (66.3) |
| Americas | 7 | 13.7 | United States (23.3) |
| Middle East & Africa | 7 | 13.0 | United Arab Emirates (41.9) |
What the index reveals
What the data says: Singapore leads with 76.5/100, 3.5× the median score of 21.6. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows trade strength is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.
For Sweden, the index indicates a middling position on trade strength: 19th of 49 (27.7/100), strongest on surplus and with most room to improve on reserves.
Top 5 vs bottom 5
The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.
| Top 5 | Score /100 | Bottom 5 | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Singapore | 76.5 | 45. Colombia | 10.0 |
| 2. Ireland | 66.3 | 46. Romania | 9.6 |
| 3. China | 48.8 | 47. Argentina | 9.0 |
| 4. Viet Nam | 45.8 | 48. Egypt | 7.0 |
| 5. Switzerland | 43.9 | 49. Ukraine | 4.9 |
How the index is built
The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index ranks economies on their strength as traders — how open they are, whether they run external surpluses, how sophisticated their exports are, and the reserves that back their external position.
Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.
| Dimension | Direction | World Bank series |
|---|---|---|
| Openness (exports, % of GDP) | higher = better | NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS |
| Surplus (current account, % of GDP) | higher = better | BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS |
| Export sophistication (high-tech) | higher = better | TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS |
| Reserves (foreign-exchange reserves) | higher = better | FI.RES.TOTL.CD |
Full ranking — 49 economies
Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.
| # | Country | Index | Openness | Surplus | High-tech | Reserves |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | 76.5 | 100.0 | 97.3 | 97.4 | 11.3 |
| 2 | Ireland | 66.3 | 77.4 | 100.0 | 87.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 | China | 48.8 | 6.1 | 46.3 | 42.6 | 100.0 |
| 4 | Viet Nam | 45.8 | 52.3 | 56.4 | 72.3 | 2.1 |
| 5 | Switzerland | 43.9 | 40.2 | 58.9 | 48.1 | 28.5 |
| 6 | Malaysia | 43.4 | 36.0 | 38.1 | 96.1 | 3.2 |
| 7 | United Arab Emirates | 41.9 | 57.5 | 88.5 | 13.9 | 7.6 |
| 8 | Norway | 37.6 | 20.6 | 86.5 | 41.2 | 2.1 |
| 9 | Netherlands | 37.5 | 41.8 | 67.4 | 37.9 | 2.9 |
| 10 | South Korea | 37.2 | 20.8 | 57.3 | 59.1 | 11.5 |
| 11 | Denmark | 36.6 | 35.4 | 79.5 | 28.3 | 3.2 |
| 12 | Thailand | 32.9 | 36.1 | 42.3 | 45.9 | 7.3 |
| 13 | Philippines | 32.6 | 9.3 | 18.2 | 100.0 | 2.8 |
| 14 | Iceland | 30.9 | 17.5 | 17.7 | 88.4 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Japan | 30.4 | 6.6 | 50.6 | 28.1 | 36.5 |
| 16 | Israel | 28.4 | 9.9 | 36.9 | 60.7 | 5.9 |
| 17 | Hungary | 28.2 | 36.9 | 37.9 | 36.5 | 1.4 |
| 18 | Germany | 27.7 | 17.7 | 49.2 | 28.8 | 15.1 |
| 19 | Sweden | 27.7 | 25.3 | 55.3 | 28.3 | 1.8 |
| 20 | Czechia | 27.0 | 33.5 | 33.9 | 36.2 | 4.5 |
| 21 | Belgium | 24.1 | 38.6 | 23.8 | 32.8 | 1.3 |
| 22 | Austria | 23.9 | 26.2 | 38.5 | 29.6 | 1.2 |
| 23 | United States | 23.3 | 0.0 | 17.1 | 39.3 | 36.8 |
| 24 | France | 23.1 | 13.4 | 30.3 | 37.4 | 11.2 |
| 25 | United Kingdom | 21.6 | 11.8 | 21.8 | 47.5 | 5.5 |
| 26 | India | 21.2 | 6.8 | 29.7 | 29.8 | 18.5 |
| 27 | Mexico | 21.1 | 17.2 | 29.6 | 31.0 | 6.6 |
| 28 | Poland | 20.0 | 23.4 | 27.9 | 21.5 | 7.1 |
| 29 | Italy | 19.8 | 12.7 | 35.9 | 19.4 | 11.4 |
| 30 | Spain | 19.0 | 15.4 | 43.0 | 14.5 | 3.2 |
| 31 | Russia | 18.4 | 4.3 | 38.0 | 15.2 | 16.1 |
| 32 | Nigeria | 18.3 | — | 50.4 | 3.6 | 1.0 |
| 33 | Portugal | 17.8 | 19.6 | 39.6 | 10.3 | 1.6 |
| 34 | Australia | 17.7 | 7.4 | 20.8 | 40.7 | 1.7 |
| 35 | Finland | 17.6 | 18.8 | 36.7 | 14.5 | 0.4 |
| 36 | Canada | 17.5 | 12.2 | 27.6 | 26.9 | 3.2 |
| 37 | Indonesia | 13.9 | 7.1 | 31.0 | 13.5 | 4.0 |
| 38 | Chile | 13.7 | 14.1 | 26.6 | 12.9 | 1.1 |
| 39 | South Africa | 13.0 | 12.2 | 29.7 | 8.5 | 1.8 |
| 40 | Brazil | 12.7 | 4.1 | 19.9 | 17.5 | 9.4 |
| 41 | Turkiye | 12.3 | 8.3 | 28.4 | 7.6 | 4.8 |
| 42 | New Zealand | 11.6 | 8.2 | 17.1 | 20.6 | 0.5 |
| 43 | Saudi Arabia | 11.4 | 11.2 | 21.3 | 0.0 | 13.3 |
| 44 | Greece | 11.2 | 17.1 | 3.4 | 23.9 | 0.4 |
| 45 | Colombia | 10.0 | 2.4 | 22.0 | 14.0 | 1.6 |
| 46 | Romania | 9.6 | 14.7 | 0.2 | 21.4 | 2.2 |
| 47 | Argentina | 9.0 | 2.7 | 27.0 | 5.5 | 0.9 |
| 48 | Egypt | 7.0 | 5.3 | 16.3 | 5.4 | 1.1 |
| 49 | Ukraine | 4.9 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 1.3 |
Limitations & what the index can't tell you
This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).
The index measures the dimensions of trade strength that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.
Scoreboard (machine-readable data)
Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.
Methodology & verification
The Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 equal-weights 4 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.
Data dictionary
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| metric | string | trade_powerhouse_index |
| label | string | Country name |
| value | number | Composite score, 0–100 |
| unit | string | /100 |
| geography | string | Country |
Frequently asked questions
What is the Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026?
A composite ranking of 49 economies on trade strength, combining 4 World Bank dimensions (Openness, Surplus, High-tech, Reserves), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.
Which country ranks first?
Singapore leads with 76.5/100. Top five: Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam, Switzerland.
Where does Sweden rank?
Sweden ranks 19th of 49 with 27.7/100, strongest on surplus.
How is it calculated?
Each of 4 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.
Is this an official index?
No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.
Can I download the data?
Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.
Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Trade Powerhouse Index?
The top five are Singapore, Ireland, China, Viet Nam and Switzerland, based on the Trade Powerhouse Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).
Where does Sweden rank in the Trade Powerhouse Index?
Sweden ranks #19 of 49 (27.7) in the Trade Powerhouse Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.
How many countries are ranked in the Trade Powerhouse Index?
49 economies are included in the Trade Powerhouse Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Glossary
- Composite index
- A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 4 normalised dimensions. ↗
- Min-max normalisation
- Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted. ↗
- Openness
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Surplus
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Export sophistication
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Reserves
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series FI.RES.TOTL.CD (higher is better). ↗
Embed & cite this report
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.
Embed (HTML) — auto-updating
<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/trade-powerhouse-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index">Affärslivet</a></p>
APA
Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index
MLA
Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index.
BibTeX
@techreport{affarslivet_trade_powerhouse_index,
title = {Affärslivet Trade Powerhouse Index 2026},
author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 1.0},
url = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/trade-powerhouse-index}
} License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.