Affärslivet composite index · 3 dimensions · World Bank data
Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026
The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on environmental performance across 3 equal-weighted dimensions. Sweden leads (82.2/100); Sweden ranks 1st. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.
TL;DR — Sweden leads the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 with 82.2/100.
World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 898 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON
Executive summary
The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on environmental performance by combining 3 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. As decarbonisation reshapes industry and capital allocation, a green economy is increasingly a competitive one; this index tracks who is furthest along. Sweden leads with 82.2/100; Sweden ranks 1st of 49 with 82.2/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Key findings
Sweden leads on environmental performance
Sweden tops the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 with a composite score of 82.2/100. Top five: Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil, Colombia.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
Where Sweden ranks
Sweden ranks 1st of 49 (82.2/100). Strongest dimension: forest cover (93.2/100); weakest: renewable energy (70.2/100).
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
The dimensions
The index combines renewable energy, low emissions, forest cover — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High
Data vintage — August 2026
Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.
The index — top economies
The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 3 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.
Sweden, dimension by dimension
Sweden ranks 1st of 49 overall (82.2/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish environmental performance is genuinely strong and where it lags.
Sweden's profile is relatively balanced (a 23-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on forest cover and lowest on renewable energy.
| Dimension | Score /100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Renewable energy (% of final energy) | 70.2 | 4th of 49 |
| Low emissions (CO2 per capita) | 83.2 | 10th of 49 |
| Forest cover (% of land) | 93.2 | 2nd of 49 |
Who leads each dimension
No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Sweden) leads by being strong across the board (a 23-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.
| Dimension | World leader | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|
| Renewable energy (% of final energy) | Iceland | 100.0 |
| Low emissions (CO2 per capita) | Nigeria | 100.0 |
| Forest cover (% of land) | Finland | 100.0 |
Regional patterns
Median composite score by world region reveals where environmental performance concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.
| Region | Economies | Median score | Regional leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia-Pacific | 12 | 52.0 | Indonesia (58.8) |
| Americas | 7 | 48.0 | Brazil (75.5) |
| Europe | 23 | 47.3 | Sweden (82.2) |
| Middle East & Africa | 7 | 31.8 | Nigeria (76.3) |
What the index reveals
What the data says: Sweden leads with 82.2/100, 1.7× the median score of 47.3. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows environmental performance is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.
For Sweden, the index indicates a genuine world leader on environmental performance: 1st of 49 (82.2/100), strongest on forest cover and with most room to improve on renewable energy.
Top 5 vs bottom 5
The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.
| Top 5 | Score /100 | Bottom 5 | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Sweden | 82.2 | 45. United States | 28.7 |
| 2. Finland | 77.7 | 46. Singapore | 26.1 |
| 3. Nigeria | 76.3 | 47. Australia | 21.0 |
| 4. Brazil | 75.5 | 48. United Arab Emirates | 2.8 |
| 5. Colombia | 66.9 | 49. Saudi Arabia | 0.2 |
How the index is built
The Affärslivet Green Economy Index ranks economies on environmental performance — the share of energy from renewables, how low their per-capita carbon emissions are, and how much forest cover they retain.
Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.
| Dimension | Direction | World Bank series |
|---|---|---|
| Renewable energy (% of final energy) | higher = better | EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS |
| Low emissions (CO2 per capita) | lower = better | EN.GHG.CO2.PC.CE.AR5 |
| Forest cover (% of land) | higher = better | AG.LND.FRST.ZS |
Full ranking — 49 economies
Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.
| # | Country | Index | Renewables | Low CO2 | Forest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweden | 82.2 | 70.2 | 83.2 | 93.2 |
| 2 | Finland | 77.7 | 60.9 | 72.3 | 100.0 |
| 3 | Nigeria | 76.3 | 97.4 | 100.0 | 31.4 |
| 4 | Brazil | 75.5 | 56.4 | 90.2 | 80.0 |
| 5 | Colombia | 66.9 | 36.0 | 93.1 | 71.6 |
| 6 | Norway | 61.0 | 74.5 | 63.1 | 45.4 |
| 7 | Indonesia | 58.8 | 24.4 | 87.2 | 64.7 |
| 8 | Austria | 58.5 | 43.6 | 67.9 | 64.1 |
| 9 | Viet Nam | 57.7 | 29.3 | 79.4 | 64.3 |
| 10 | Portugal | 57.6 | 39.1 | 84.6 | 49.0 |
| 11 | India | 55.5 | 42.3 | 91.0 | 33.2 |
| 12 | Japan | 54.3 | 10.6 | 59.4 | 92.8 |
| 13 | Philippines | 53.9 | 33.9 | 94.8 | 33.1 |
| 14 | Switzerland | 53.2 | 33.5 | 82.3 | 43.9 |
| 15 | Thailand | 52.2 | 23.0 | 81.1 | 52.4 |
| 16 | Iceland | 52.1 | 100.0 | 55.6 | 0.7 |
| 17 | New Zealand | 51.9 | 35.0 | 69.6 | 51.2 |
| 18 | Romania | 50.6 | 28.6 | 82.4 | 40.8 |
| 19 | Spain | 50.5 | 23.0 | 78.0 | 50.4 |
| 20 | Denmark | 49.5 | 47.9 | 79.3 | 21.4 |
| 21 | Chile | 48.1 | 29.3 | 81.2 | 33.9 |
| 22 | France | 48.1 | 19.6 | 80.8 | 44.0 |
| 23 | Mexico | 48.0 | 15.7 | 82.9 | 45.5 |
| 24 | Malaysia | 48.0 | 9.0 | 56.7 | 78.3 |
| 25 | Greece | 47.3 | 26.0 | 75.0 | 41.0 |
| 26 | Italy | 46.8 | 21.1 | 74.8 | 44.6 |
| 27 | Czechia | 43.8 | 20.8 | 63.4 | 47.1 |
| 28 | South Korea | 43.7 | 4.3 | 39.8 | 87.0 |
| 29 | Germany | 43.3 | 21.3 | 64.4 | 44.3 |
| 30 | Turkiye | 42.5 | 14.5 | 73.1 | 39.9 |
| 31 | Hungary | 42.4 | 18.5 | 78.3 | 30.4 |
| 32 | Poland | 40.5 | 18.3 | 61.0 | 42.1 |
| 33 | Ukraine | 39.7 | 10.7 | 85.7 | 22.7 |
| 34 | United Kingdom | 37.4 | 14.7 | 79.6 | 18.0 |
| 35 | Canada | 35.8 | 28.8 | 25.0 | 53.5 |
| 36 | Belgium | 35.7 | 14.1 | 62.4 | 30.6 |
| 37 | Argentina | 35.3 | 11.1 | 80.8 | 13.9 |
| 38 | China | 34.0 | 18.3 | 51.2 | 32.6 |
| 39 | Ireland | 33.5 | 15.3 | 69.5 | 15.6 |
| 40 | Egypt | 32.2 | 7.3 | 89.2 | 0.0 |
| 41 | Russia | 32.2 | 4.1 | 25.1 | 67.5 |
| 42 | Netherlands | 32.0 | 14.7 | 66.3 | 14.9 |
| 43 | South Africa | 31.8 | 11.7 | 64.8 | 18.9 |
| 44 | Israel | 29.0 | 7.4 | 71.0 | 8.7 |
| 45 | United States | 28.7 | 13.1 | 27.1 | 45.9 |
| 46 | Singapore | 26.1 | 1.2 | 48.7 | 28.4 |
| 47 | Australia | 21.0 | 14.8 | 24.5 | 23.6 |
| 48 | United Arab Emirates | 2.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 6.0 |
| 49 | Saudi Arabia | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Limitations & what the index can't tell you
This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).
The index measures the dimensions of environmental performance that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.
Scoreboard (machine-readable data)
Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.
Methodology & verification
The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 equal-weights 3 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.
Data dictionary
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| metric | string | green_economy_index |
| label | string | Country name |
| value | number | Composite score, 0–100 |
| unit | string | /100 |
| geography | string | Country |
Frequently asked questions
What is the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026?
A composite ranking of 49 economies on environmental performance, combining 3 World Bank dimensions (Renewables, Low CO2, Forest), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.
Which country ranks first?
Sweden leads with 82.2/100. Top five: Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil, Colombia.
Where does Sweden rank?
Sweden ranks 1st of 49 with 82.2/100, strongest on forest cover.
How is it calculated?
Each of 3 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.
Is this an official index?
No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.
Can I download the data?
Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.
Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Green Economy Index?
The top five are Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil and Colombia, based on the Green Economy Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).
Where does Sweden rank in the Green Economy Index?
Sweden ranks #1 of 49 (82.2) in the Green Economy Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.
How many countries are ranked in the Green Economy Index?
49 economies are included in the Green Economy Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Glossary
- Composite index
- A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 3 normalised dimensions. ↗
- Min-max normalisation
- Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted. ↗
- Renewable energy
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Low emissions
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series EN.GHG.CO2.PC.CE.AR5 (lower is better). ↗
- Forest cover
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series AG.LND.FRST.ZS (higher is better). ↗
Embed & cite this report
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.
Embed (HTML) — auto-updating
<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/green-economy-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index">Affärslivet</a></p>
APA
Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index
MLA
Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index.
BibTeX
@techreport{affarslivet_green_economy_index,
title = {Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026},
author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 1.0},
url = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index}
} License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.