Affärslivet

Affärslivet composite index · 3 dimensions · World Bank data

Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026

The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on environmental performance across 3 equal-weighted dimensions. Sweden leads (82.2/100); Sweden ranks 1st. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.

TL;DRSweden leads the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 with 82.2/100.

World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 898 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON

82.2/100Top (Sweden)composite score
1stSweden's rankof 49 economies
82.2/100Sweden's scorecomposite
3Dimensionsequal-weighted
49Economies ranked≥3 dimensions
CC BY 4.0Licencefree to reuse

Executive summary

The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on environmental performance by combining 3 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. As decarbonisation reshapes industry and capital allocation, a green economy is increasingly a competitive one; this index tracks who is furthest along. Sweden leads with 82.2/100; Sweden ranks 1st of 49 with 82.2/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Key findings

0182.2/100of 49 economies

Sweden leads on environmental performance

Sweden tops the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 with a composite score of 82.2/100. Top five: Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil, Colombia.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

021stscore 82.2/100

Where Sweden ranks

Sweden ranks 1st of 49 (82.2/100). Strongest dimension: forest cover (93.2/100); weakest: renewable energy (70.2/100).

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

033 measuresRenewables, Low CO2, Forest

The dimensions

The index combines renewable energy, low emissions, forest cover — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High

Data vintage — August 2026

Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.

The index — top economies

The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 3 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.

Sweden, dimension by dimension

Sweden ranks 1st of 49 overall (82.2/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish environmental performance is genuinely strong and where it lags.

Sweden's profile is relatively balanced (a 23-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on forest cover and lowest on renewable energy.

DimensionScore /100Rank
Renewable energy (% of final energy)70.24th of 49
Low emissions (CO2 per capita)83.210th of 49
Forest cover (% of land)93.22nd of 49

Who leads each dimension

No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Sweden) leads by being strong across the board (a 23-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.

DimensionWorld leaderScore /100
Renewable energy (% of final energy)Iceland100.0
Low emissions (CO2 per capita)Nigeria100.0
Forest cover (% of land)Finland100.0

Regional patterns

Median composite score by world region reveals where environmental performance concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.

RegionEconomiesMedian scoreRegional leader
Asia-Pacific1252.0Indonesia (58.8)
Americas748.0Brazil (75.5)
Europe2347.3Sweden (82.2)
Middle East & Africa731.8Nigeria (76.3)

What the index reveals

What the data says: Sweden leads with 82.2/100, 1.7× the median score of 47.3. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows environmental performance is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.

For Sweden, the index indicates a genuine world leader on environmental performance: 1st of 49 (82.2/100), strongest on forest cover and with most room to improve on renewable energy.

Top 5 vs bottom 5

The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.

Top 5Score /100Bottom 5Score /100
1. Sweden82.245. United States28.7
2. Finland77.746. Singapore26.1
3. Nigeria76.347. Australia21.0
4. Brazil75.548. United Arab Emirates2.8
5. Colombia66.949. Saudi Arabia0.2

How the index is built

The Affärslivet Green Economy Index ranks economies on environmental performance — the share of energy from renewables, how low their per-capita carbon emissions are, and how much forest cover they retain.

Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.

DimensionDirectionWorld Bank series
Renewable energy (% of final energy)higher = betterEG.FEC.RNEW.ZS
Low emissions (CO2 per capita)lower = betterEN.GHG.CO2.PC.CE.AR5
Forest cover (% of land)higher = betterAG.LND.FRST.ZS

Full ranking — 49 economies

Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.

#CountryIndexRenewablesLow CO2Forest
1Sweden82.270.283.293.2
2Finland77.760.972.3100.0
3Nigeria76.397.4100.031.4
4Brazil75.556.490.280.0
5Colombia66.936.093.171.6
6Norway61.074.563.145.4
7Indonesia58.824.487.264.7
8Austria58.543.667.964.1
9Viet Nam57.729.379.464.3
10Portugal57.639.184.649.0
11India55.542.391.033.2
12Japan54.310.659.492.8
13Philippines53.933.994.833.1
14Switzerland53.233.582.343.9
15Thailand52.223.081.152.4
16Iceland52.1100.055.60.7
17New Zealand51.935.069.651.2
18Romania50.628.682.440.8
19Spain50.523.078.050.4
20Denmark49.547.979.321.4
21Chile48.129.381.233.9
22France48.119.680.844.0
23Mexico48.015.782.945.5
24Malaysia48.09.056.778.3
25Greece47.326.075.041.0
26Italy46.821.174.844.6
27Czechia43.820.863.447.1
28South Korea43.74.339.887.0
29Germany43.321.364.444.3
30Turkiye42.514.573.139.9
31Hungary42.418.578.330.4
32Poland40.518.361.042.1
33Ukraine39.710.785.722.7
34United Kingdom37.414.779.618.0
35Canada35.828.825.053.5
36Belgium35.714.162.430.6
37Argentina35.311.180.813.9
38China34.018.351.232.6
39Ireland33.515.369.515.6
40Egypt32.27.389.20.0
41Russia32.24.125.167.5
42Netherlands32.014.766.314.9
43South Africa31.811.764.818.9
44Israel29.07.471.08.7
45United States28.713.127.145.9
46Singapore26.11.248.728.4
47Australia21.014.824.523.6
48United Arab Emirates2.81.11.36.0
49Saudi Arabia0.20.00.00.6

Limitations & what the index can't tell you

This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).

The index measures the dimensions of environmental performance that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.

Scoreboard (machine-readable data)

Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.

↓ CSV · ↓ JSON

IndicatorValuePeriodSourceConf.
Sweden82.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Finland77.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Nigeria76.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Brazil75.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Colombia66.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Norway61 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Indonesia58.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Austria58.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Viet Nam57.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Portugal57.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
India55.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Japan54.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Philippines53.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Switzerland53.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Thailand52.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Iceland52.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
New Zealand51.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Romania50.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Spain50.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Denmark49.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Chile48.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
France48.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Mexico48 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Malaysia48 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Greece47.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Italy46.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Czechia43.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Korea43.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Germany43.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Turkiye42.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Hungary42.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Poland40.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Ukraine39.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Kingdom37.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Canada35.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Belgium35.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Argentina35.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
China34 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Ireland33.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Egypt32.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Russia32.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Netherlands32 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Africa31.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Israel29 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United States28.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Singapore26.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Australia21 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Arab Emirates2.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Saudi Arabia0.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High

Methodology & verification

The Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 equal-weights 3 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.

Data dictionary

FieldTypeDescription
metricstringgreen_economy_index
labelstringCountry name
valuenumberComposite score, 0–100
unitstring/100
geographystringCountry

Frequently asked questions

What is the Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026?

A composite ranking of 49 economies on environmental performance, combining 3 World Bank dimensions (Renewables, Low CO2, Forest), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.

Which country ranks first?

Sweden leads with 82.2/100. Top five: Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil, Colombia.

Where does Sweden rank?

Sweden ranks 1st of 49 with 82.2/100, strongest on forest cover.

How is it calculated?

Each of 3 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.

Is this an official index?

No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.

Can I download the data?

Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.

Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Green Economy Index?

The top five are Sweden, Finland, Nigeria, Brazil and Colombia, based on the Green Economy Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).

Where does Sweden rank in the Green Economy Index?

Sweden ranks #1 of 49 (82.2) in the Green Economy Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.

How many countries are ranked in the Green Economy Index?

49 economies are included in the Green Economy Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Glossary

Composite index
A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 3 normalised dimensions.
Min-max normalisation
Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted.
Renewable energy
Dimension of the index — World Bank series EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS (higher is better).
Low emissions
Dimension of the index — World Bank series EN.GHG.CO2.PC.CE.AR5 (lower is better).
Forest cover
Dimension of the index — World Bank series AG.LND.FRST.ZS (higher is better).

Embed & cite this report

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.

Embed (HTML) — auto-updating

<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/green-economy-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index">Affärslivet</a></p>

APA

Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index

MLA

Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index.

BibTeX

@techreport{affarslivet_green_economy_index,
  title  = {Affärslivet Green Economy Index 2026},
  author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Version 1.0},
  url    = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/green-economy-index}
}

License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.

Sources