Affärslivet

Affärslivet composite index · 4 dimensions · World Bank data

Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026

The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on global connectedness across 4 equal-weighted dimensions. Ireland leads (57.1/100); Sweden ranks 18th. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.

TL;DRIreland leads the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 with 57.1/100.

World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 897 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON

57.1/100Top (Ireland)composite score
18thSweden's rankof 49 economies
28.8/100Sweden's scorecomposite
4Dimensionsequal-weighted
49Economies ranked≥3 dimensions
CC BY 4.0Licencefree to reuse

Executive summary

The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on global connectedness by combining 4 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. Openness is a structural advantage: connected economies absorb ideas, capital and demand faster. This index combines four World Bank measures of how outward-facing each economy really is. Ireland leads with 57.1/100; Sweden ranks 18th of 49 with 28.8/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Key findings

0157.1/100of 49 economies

Ireland leads on global connectedness

Ireland tops the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 with a composite score of 57.1/100. Top five: Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France, Israel.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

0218thscore 28.8/100

Where Sweden ranks

Sweden ranks 18th of 49 (28.8/100). Strongest dimension: investment openness (57.1/100); weakest: tourism (1.3/100).

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High

034 measuresExports, FDI, Digital exp., Tourism

The dimensions

The index combines trade openness, investment openness, digital-services exports, tourism — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.

Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High

Data vintage — August 2026

Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.

The index — top economies

The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 4 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.

Sweden, dimension by dimension

Sweden ranks 18th of 49 overall (28.8/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish global connectedness is genuinely strong and where it lags.

Sweden's profile is relatively lopsided (a 56-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on investment openness and lowest on tourism.

DimensionScore /100Rank
Trade openness (exports, % of GDP)25.314th of 48
Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP)57.113th of 49
Digital-services exports (% of service exports)31.37th of 48
Tourism (international arrivals)1.342nd of 49

Who leads each dimension

No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Ireland) leads by being strong across the board (a 80-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.

DimensionWorld leaderScore /100
Trade openness (exports, % of GDP)Singapore100.0
Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP)Singapore100.0
Digital-services exports (% of service exports)Israel100.0
Tourism (international arrivals)France100.0

Regional patterns

Median composite score by world region reveals where global connectedness concentrates. Europe leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.

RegionEconomiesMedian scoreRegional leader
Europe2327.7Ireland (57.1)
Asia-Pacific1225.6Singapore (53.4)
Americas721.9Mexico (30.9)
Middle East & Africa721.1Israel (43.4)

What the index reveals

What the data says: Ireland leads with 57.1/100, 2.2× the median score of 26.5. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows global connectedness is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.

For Sweden, the index indicates a middling position on global connectedness: 18th of 49 (28.8/100), strongest on investment openness and with most room to improve on tourism.

Top 5 vs bottom 5

The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.

Top 5Score /100Bottom 5Score /100
1. Ireland57.145. Colombia19.3
2. Singapore53.446. Japan17.9
3. Poland44.947. New Zealand17.7
4. France44.748. Russia17.7
5. Israel43.449. Australia17.1

How the index is built

The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index ranks economies on how deeply they are woven into the world economy — through trade, foreign investment, digital-services exports and inbound tourism.

Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.

DimensionDirectionWorld Bank series
Trade openness (exports, % of GDP)higher = betterNE.EXP.GNFS.ZS
Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP)higher = betterBX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS
Digital-services exports (% of service exports)higher = betterBX.GSR.CCIS.ZS
Tourism (international arrivals)higher = betterST.INT.ARVL

Full ranking — 49 economies

Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.

#CountryIndexExportsFDIDigital exp.Tourism
1Ireland57.177.453.388.69.0
2Singapore53.4100.0100.011.51.9
3Poland44.923.455.425.475.5
4France44.713.455.89.7100.0
5Israel43.49.959.7100.03.8
6Viet Nam38.352.359.62.9
7India37.66.853.774.914.9
8Czechia37.333.556.827.431.5
9United Arab Emirates34.357.567.06.26.5
10Thailand31.936.157.80.033.8
11Ukraine31.48.655.758.62.5
12Mexico30.917.256.27.043.4
13Finland30.218.851.750.20.3
14Switzerland29.740.249.719.19.7
15Denmark29.735.459.710.713.0
16Canada29.612.257.321.527.4
17Spain29.015.454.515.330.8
18Sweden28.825.357.131.31.3
19Romania28.514.755.939.63.9
20China28.36.152.628.925.7
21Netherlands27.741.849.313.95.8
22Malaysia27.636.058.612.63.3
23Belgium26.838.644.622.31.8
24Austria26.526.248.219.212.5
25Italy26.512.751.98.832.5
26United States26.10.054.212.038.2
27Germany25.117.755.317.010.3
28Portugal23.719.659.712.33.2
29South Korea23.620.853.418.51.7
30Philippines22.79.354.825.80.9
31United Kingdom22.411.855.413.19.1
32Saudi Arabia22.411.256.54.717.0
33Brazil21.94.158.120.45.0
34Chile21.414.159.38.24.2
35Argentina21.22.752.723.55.9
36Egypt21.15.359.68.510.8
37Iceland21.017.550.915.60.0
38Greece20.917.156.74.05.9
39Norway20.920.649.213.00.8
40Nigeria20.354.42.44.1
41Turkiye20.38.353.46.213.3
42Hungary20.136.90.016.626.7
43South Africa19.912.250.913.82.9
44Indonesia19.87.154.714.13.1
45Colombia19.32.456.517.50.8
46Japan17.96.653.78.43.1
47New Zealand17.78.254.47.90.4
48Russia17.74.353.58.15.0
49Australia17.17.455.64.31.1

Limitations & what the index can't tell you

This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).

The index measures the dimensions of global connectedness that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.

Scoreboard (machine-readable data)

Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.

↓ CSV · ↓ JSON

IndicatorValuePeriodSourceConf.
Ireland57.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Singapore53.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Poland44.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
France44.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Israel43.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Viet Nam38.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
India37.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Czechia37.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Arab Emirates34.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Thailand31.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Ukraine31.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Mexico30.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Finland30.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Switzerland29.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Denmark29.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Canada29.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Spain29 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Sweden28.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Romania28.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
China28.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Netherlands27.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Malaysia27.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Belgium26.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Austria26.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Italy26.5 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United States26.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Germany25.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Portugal23.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Korea23.6 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Philippines22.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
United Kingdom22.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Saudi Arabia22.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Brazil21.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Chile21.4 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Argentina21.2 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Egypt21.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Iceland21 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Greece20.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Norway20.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Nigeria20.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Turkiye20.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Hungary20.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
South Africa19.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Indonesia19.8 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Colombia19.3 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Japan17.9 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
New Zealand17.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Russia17.7 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High
Australia17.1 /1002026Affärslivet Research (World Bank)Medium-High

Methodology & verification

The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 equal-weights 4 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.

Data dictionary

FieldTypeDescription
metricstringglobal_connectedness_index
labelstringCountry name
valuenumberComposite score, 0–100
unitstring/100
geographystringCountry

Frequently asked questions

What is the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026?

A composite ranking of 49 economies on global connectedness, combining 4 World Bank dimensions (Exports, FDI, Digital exp., Tourism), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.

Which country ranks first?

Ireland leads with 57.1/100. Top five: Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France, Israel.

Where does Sweden rank?

Sweden ranks 18th of 49 with 28.8/100, strongest on investment openness.

How is it calculated?

Each of 4 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.

Is this an official index?

No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.

Can I download the data?

Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.

Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Global Connectedness Index?

The top five are Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France and Israel, based on the Global Connectedness Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).

Where does Sweden rank in the Global Connectedness Index?

Sweden ranks #18 of 49 (28.8) in the Global Connectedness Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.

How many countries are ranked in the Global Connectedness Index?

49 economies are included in the Global Connectedness Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Glossary

Composite index
A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 4 normalised dimensions.
Min-max normalisation
Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted.
Trade openness
Dimension of the index — World Bank series NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (higher is better).
Investment openness
Dimension of the index — World Bank series BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS (higher is better).
Digital-services exports
Dimension of the index — World Bank series BX.GSR.CCIS.ZS (higher is better).
Tourism
Dimension of the index — World Bank series ST.INT.ARVL (higher is better).

Embed & cite this report

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.

Embed (HTML) — auto-updating

<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/global-connectedness-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index">Affärslivet</a></p>

APA

Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index

MLA

Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index.

BibTeX

@techreport{affarslivet_global_connectedness_index,
  title  = {Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026},
  author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Version 1.0},
  url    = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index}
}

License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.

Sources