Affärslivet composite index · 4 dimensions · World Bank data
Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026
The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on global connectedness across 4 equal-weighted dimensions. Ireland leads (57.1/100); Sweden ranks 18th. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.
TL;DR — Ireland leads the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 with 57.1/100.
World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 49 entities | 897 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON
Executive summary
The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 ranks 49 economies on global connectedness by combining 4 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. Openness is a structural advantage: connected economies absorb ideas, capital and demand faster. This index combines four World Bank measures of how outward-facing each economy really is. Ireland leads with 57.1/100; Sweden ranks 18th of 49 with 28.8/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Key findings
Ireland leads on global connectedness
Ireland tops the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 with a composite score of 57.1/100. Top five: Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France, Israel.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
Where Sweden ranks
Sweden ranks 18th of 49 (28.8/100). Strongest dimension: investment openness (57.1/100); weakest: tourism (1.3/100).
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
The dimensions
The index combines trade openness, investment openness, digital-services exports, tourism — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High
Data vintage — August 2026
Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.
The index — top economies
The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 4 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 49 ranked economies.
Sweden, dimension by dimension
Sweden ranks 18th of 49 overall (28.8/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish global connectedness is genuinely strong and where it lags.
Sweden's profile is relatively lopsided (a 56-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on investment openness and lowest on tourism.
| Dimension | Score /100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Trade openness (exports, % of GDP) | 25.3 | 14th of 48 |
| Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP) | 57.1 | 13th of 49 |
| Digital-services exports (% of service exports) | 31.3 | 7th of 48 |
| Tourism (international arrivals) | 1.3 | 42nd of 49 |
Who leads each dimension
No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Ireland) leads by being strong across the board (a 80-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.
| Dimension | World leader | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade openness (exports, % of GDP) | Singapore | 100.0 |
| Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP) | Singapore | 100.0 |
| Digital-services exports (% of service exports) | Israel | 100.0 |
| Tourism (international arrivals) | France | 100.0 |
Regional patterns
Median composite score by world region reveals where global connectedness concentrates. Europe leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.
| Region | Economies | Median score | Regional leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 23 | 27.7 | Ireland (57.1) |
| Asia-Pacific | 12 | 25.6 | Singapore (53.4) |
| Americas | 7 | 21.9 | Mexico (30.9) |
| Middle East & Africa | 7 | 21.1 | Israel (43.4) |
What the index reveals
What the data says: Ireland leads with 57.1/100, 2.2× the median score of 26.5. The spread across the 49 ranked economies shows global connectedness is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.
For Sweden, the index indicates a middling position on global connectedness: 18th of 49 (28.8/100), strongest on investment openness and with most room to improve on tourism.
Top 5 vs bottom 5
The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 49 ranked economies.
| Top 5 | Score /100 | Bottom 5 | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ireland | 57.1 | 45. Colombia | 19.3 |
| 2. Singapore | 53.4 | 46. Japan | 17.9 |
| 3. Poland | 44.9 | 47. New Zealand | 17.7 |
| 4. France | 44.7 | 48. Russia | 17.7 |
| 5. Israel | 43.4 | 49. Australia | 17.1 |
How the index is built
The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index ranks economies on how deeply they are woven into the world economy — through trade, foreign investment, digital-services exports and inbound tourism.
Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.
| Dimension | Direction | World Bank series |
|---|---|---|
| Trade openness (exports, % of GDP) | higher = better | NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS |
| Investment openness (FDI, % of GDP) | higher = better | BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS |
| Digital-services exports (% of service exports) | higher = better | BX.GSR.CCIS.ZS |
| Tourism (international arrivals) | higher = better | ST.INT.ARVL |
Full ranking — 49 economies
Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.
| # | Country | Index | Exports | FDI | Digital exp. | Tourism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ireland | 57.1 | 77.4 | 53.3 | 88.6 | 9.0 |
| 2 | Singapore | 53.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11.5 | 1.9 |
| 3 | Poland | 44.9 | 23.4 | 55.4 | 25.4 | 75.5 |
| 4 | France | 44.7 | 13.4 | 55.8 | 9.7 | 100.0 |
| 5 | Israel | 43.4 | 9.9 | 59.7 | 100.0 | 3.8 |
| 6 | Viet Nam | 38.3 | 52.3 | 59.6 | — | 2.9 |
| 7 | India | 37.6 | 6.8 | 53.7 | 74.9 | 14.9 |
| 8 | Czechia | 37.3 | 33.5 | 56.8 | 27.4 | 31.5 |
| 9 | United Arab Emirates | 34.3 | 57.5 | 67.0 | 6.2 | 6.5 |
| 10 | Thailand | 31.9 | 36.1 | 57.8 | 0.0 | 33.8 |
| 11 | Ukraine | 31.4 | 8.6 | 55.7 | 58.6 | 2.5 |
| 12 | Mexico | 30.9 | 17.2 | 56.2 | 7.0 | 43.4 |
| 13 | Finland | 30.2 | 18.8 | 51.7 | 50.2 | 0.3 |
| 14 | Switzerland | 29.7 | 40.2 | 49.7 | 19.1 | 9.7 |
| 15 | Denmark | 29.7 | 35.4 | 59.7 | 10.7 | 13.0 |
| 16 | Canada | 29.6 | 12.2 | 57.3 | 21.5 | 27.4 |
| 17 | Spain | 29.0 | 15.4 | 54.5 | 15.3 | 30.8 |
| 18 | Sweden | 28.8 | 25.3 | 57.1 | 31.3 | 1.3 |
| 19 | Romania | 28.5 | 14.7 | 55.9 | 39.6 | 3.9 |
| 20 | China | 28.3 | 6.1 | 52.6 | 28.9 | 25.7 |
| 21 | Netherlands | 27.7 | 41.8 | 49.3 | 13.9 | 5.8 |
| 22 | Malaysia | 27.6 | 36.0 | 58.6 | 12.6 | 3.3 |
| 23 | Belgium | 26.8 | 38.6 | 44.6 | 22.3 | 1.8 |
| 24 | Austria | 26.5 | 26.2 | 48.2 | 19.2 | 12.5 |
| 25 | Italy | 26.5 | 12.7 | 51.9 | 8.8 | 32.5 |
| 26 | United States | 26.1 | 0.0 | 54.2 | 12.0 | 38.2 |
| 27 | Germany | 25.1 | 17.7 | 55.3 | 17.0 | 10.3 |
| 28 | Portugal | 23.7 | 19.6 | 59.7 | 12.3 | 3.2 |
| 29 | South Korea | 23.6 | 20.8 | 53.4 | 18.5 | 1.7 |
| 30 | Philippines | 22.7 | 9.3 | 54.8 | 25.8 | 0.9 |
| 31 | United Kingdom | 22.4 | 11.8 | 55.4 | 13.1 | 9.1 |
| 32 | Saudi Arabia | 22.4 | 11.2 | 56.5 | 4.7 | 17.0 |
| 33 | Brazil | 21.9 | 4.1 | 58.1 | 20.4 | 5.0 |
| 34 | Chile | 21.4 | 14.1 | 59.3 | 8.2 | 4.2 |
| 35 | Argentina | 21.2 | 2.7 | 52.7 | 23.5 | 5.9 |
| 36 | Egypt | 21.1 | 5.3 | 59.6 | 8.5 | 10.8 |
| 37 | Iceland | 21.0 | 17.5 | 50.9 | 15.6 | 0.0 |
| 38 | Greece | 20.9 | 17.1 | 56.7 | 4.0 | 5.9 |
| 39 | Norway | 20.9 | 20.6 | 49.2 | 13.0 | 0.8 |
| 40 | Nigeria | 20.3 | — | 54.4 | 2.4 | 4.1 |
| 41 | Turkiye | 20.3 | 8.3 | 53.4 | 6.2 | 13.3 |
| 42 | Hungary | 20.1 | 36.9 | 0.0 | 16.6 | 26.7 |
| 43 | South Africa | 19.9 | 12.2 | 50.9 | 13.8 | 2.9 |
| 44 | Indonesia | 19.8 | 7.1 | 54.7 | 14.1 | 3.1 |
| 45 | Colombia | 19.3 | 2.4 | 56.5 | 17.5 | 0.8 |
| 46 | Japan | 17.9 | 6.6 | 53.7 | 8.4 | 3.1 |
| 47 | New Zealand | 17.7 | 8.2 | 54.4 | 7.9 | 0.4 |
| 48 | Russia | 17.7 | 4.3 | 53.5 | 8.1 | 5.0 |
| 49 | Australia | 17.1 | 7.4 | 55.6 | 4.3 | 1.1 |
Limitations & what the index can't tell you
This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 49 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).
The index measures the dimensions of global connectedness that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.
Scoreboard (machine-readable data)
Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.
Methodology & verification
The Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 equal-weights 4 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.
Data dictionary
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| metric | string | global_connectedness_index |
| label | string | Country name |
| value | number | Composite score, 0–100 |
| unit | string | /100 |
| geography | string | Country |
Frequently asked questions
What is the Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026?
A composite ranking of 49 economies on global connectedness, combining 4 World Bank dimensions (Exports, FDI, Digital exp., Tourism), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.
Which country ranks first?
Ireland leads with 57.1/100. Top five: Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France, Israel.
Where does Sweden rank?
Sweden ranks 18th of 49 with 28.8/100, strongest on investment openness.
How is it calculated?
Each of 4 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.
Is this an official index?
No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.
Can I download the data?
Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.
Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Global Connectedness Index?
The top five are Ireland, Singapore, Poland, France and Israel, based on the Global Connectedness Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).
Where does Sweden rank in the Global Connectedness Index?
Sweden ranks #18 of 49 (28.8) in the Global Connectedness Index, as of 2026-08-01. Source: Affärslivet.
How many countries are ranked in the Global Connectedness Index?
49 economies are included in the Global Connectedness Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Glossary
- Composite index
- A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 4 normalised dimensions. ↗
- Min-max normalisation
- Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted. ↗
- Trade openness
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Investment openness
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Digital-services exports
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series BX.GSR.CCIS.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Tourism
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series ST.INT.ARVL (higher is better). ↗
Embed & cite this report
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.
Embed (HTML) — auto-updating
<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/global-connectedness-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index">Affärslivet</a></p>
APA
Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index
MLA
Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index.
BibTeX
@techreport{affarslivet_global_connectedness_index,
title = {Affärslivet Global Connectedness Index 2026},
author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 1.0},
url = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/global-connectedness-index}
} License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.