Affärslivet composite index · 4 dimensions · World Bank data
Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026
The Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 ranks 45 economies on financial-market depth across 4 equal-weighted dimensions. United States leads (70.4/100); Sweden ranks —. Transparent method, downloadable data, CC BY 4.0.
TL;DR — United States leads the Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 with 70.4/100.
World Bank Open Data · World Bank · World Bank · World Bank | 45 entities | 833 words · 15 sections | data: CSV + JSON
Executive summary
The Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 ranks 45 economies on financial-market depth by combining 4 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. Deep, liquid financial markets channel savings into productive investment; the index separates the world's financial centres from bank-thin economies where firms struggle to raise capital. United States leads with 70.4/100; Sweden ranks — of 45 with None/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Key findings
United States leads on financial-market depth
United States tops the Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 with a composite score of 70.4/100. Top five: United States, China, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
Where Sweden ranks
Sweden ranks not ranked of 45 (n/a/100). Strongest dimension: credit to business (60.4/100); weakest: foreign capital (57.1/100).
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: Medium-High
The dimensions
The index combines stock market size, credit to business, market liquidity, foreign capital — each an official World Bank series, equal-weighted.
Source: Affärslivet Research · 2026 · confidence: High
Data vintage — August 2026
Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available per economy. Scores are relative (normalised across the ranked set) and update as peer data changes; the index regenerates automatically.
The index — top economies
The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 4 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 45 ranked economies.
Sweden, dimension by dimension
Sweden is not ranked (insufficient dimensions).
| Dimension | Score /100 | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Credit to business (domestic credit, % of GDP) | 60.4 | 11th of 48 |
| Foreign capital (FDI, % of GDP) | 57.1 | 13th of 49 |
Who leads each dimension
No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (United States) leads by being strong across the board (a 46-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.
| Dimension | World leader | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|
| Stock market size (market cap, % of GDP) | South Africa | 100.0 |
| Credit to business (domestic credit, % of GDP) | United States | 100.0 |
| Market liquidity (stocks traded, % of GDP) | China | 100.0 |
| Foreign capital (FDI, % of GDP) | Singapore | 100.0 |
Regional patterns
Median composite score by world region reveals where financial-market depth concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.
| Region | Economies | Median score | Regional leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia-Pacific | 12 | 43.2 | China (68.1) |
| Middle East & Africa | 7 | 29.8 | South Africa (53.6) |
| Americas | 7 | 29.5 | United States (70.4) |
| Europe | 19 | 24.8 | Switzerland (58.5) |
What the index reveals
What the data says: United States leads with 70.4/100, 2.4× the median score of 29.5. The spread across the 45 ranked economies shows financial-market depth is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.
Sweden is not ranked on this index (insufficient data on the financial-market depth dimensions).
Top 5 vs bottom 5
The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 45 ranked economies.
| Top 5 | Score /100 | Bottom 5 | Score /100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. United States | 70.4 | 41. Romania | 16.7 |
| 2. China | 68.1 | 42. Nigeria | 15.8 |
| 3. Japan | 65.1 | 43. Ukraine | 15.1 |
| 4. South Korea | 58.6 | 44. Argentina | 14.6 |
| 5. Switzerland | 58.5 | 45. Hungary | 5.1 |
How the index is built
The Affärslivet Financial Development Index ranks economies on the depth and dynamism of their financial systems — the size of the stock market, the flow of credit to business, how actively shares trade, and how much foreign capital they attract.
Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 3 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.
| Dimension | Direction | World Bank series |
|---|---|---|
| Stock market size (market cap, % of GDP) | higher = better | CM.MKT.LCAP.GD.ZS |
| Credit to business (domestic credit, % of GDP) | higher = better | FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS |
| Market liquidity (stocks traded, % of GDP) | higher = better | CM.MKT.TRAD.GD.ZS |
| Foreign capital (FDI, % of GDP) | higher = better | BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS |
Full ranking — 45 economies
Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.
| # | Country | Index | Market cap | Credit | Liquidity | FDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 70.4 | 68.1 | 100.0 | 59.4 | 54.2 |
| 2 | China | 68.1 | 23.5 | 96.4 | 100.0 | 52.6 |
| 3 | Japan | 65.1 | 51.9 | 92.8 | 61.9 | 53.7 |
| 4 | South Korea | 58.6 | 44.4 | 78.7 | 58.1 | 53.4 |
| 5 | Switzerland | 58.5 | 73.4 | 82.5 | 28.2 | 49.7 |
| 6 | South Africa | 53.6 | 100.0 | 41.7 | 21.9 | 50.9 |
| 7 | Singapore | 53.3 | 41.1 | 62.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
| 8 | Canada | 53.1 | 60.5 | — | 41.5 | 57.3 |
| 9 | India | 44.2 | 81.4 | 18.0 | 23.9 | 53.7 |
| 10 | Australia | 43.7 | 34.1 | 64.8 | 20.2 | 55.6 |
| 11 | Thailand | 42.6 | 26.4 | 69.6 | 16.6 | 57.8 |
| 12 | United Arab Emirates | 40.3 | 57.9 | 29.2 | 7.2 | 67.0 |
| 13 | Malaysia | 39.0 | 30.8 | 56.5 | 9.9 | 58.6 |
| 14 | Chile | 38.4 | 41.0 | 48.3 | 5.1 | 59.3 |
| 15 | Viet Nam | 38.0 | 17.9 | 60.2 | 14.5 | 59.6 |
| 16 | France | 37.5 | 25.2 | 51.1 | 17.9 | 55.8 |
| 17 | United Kingdom | 36.0 | 29.0 | 53.6 | 6.1 | 55.4 |
| 18 | Netherlands | 35.9 | 39.0 | 38.0 | 17.4 | 49.3 |
| 19 | Saudi Arabia | 35.6 | 56.0 | 21.2 | 8.6 | 56.5 |
| 20 | Norway | 34.4 | 20.5 | 59.9 | 7.9 | 49.2 |
| 21 | New Zealand | 34.2 | 11.0 | 69.8 | 1.6 | 54.4 |
| 22 | Israel | 29.8 | 17.8 | 32.8 | 8.9 | 59.7 |
| 23 | Brazil | 29.5 | 10.8 | 34.2 | 14.9 | 58.1 |
| 24 | Germany | 29.2 | 16.7 | 35.3 | 9.7 | 55.3 |
| 25 | Italy | 29.2 | 7.3 | 26.5 | 31.1 | 51.9 |
| 26 | Spain | 29.1 | 20.0 | 33.7 | 8.1 | 54.5 |
| 27 | Portugal | 27.1 | 6.9 | 35.2 | 6.7 | 59.7 |
| 28 | Belgium | 24.8 | 17.2 | 30.6 | 6.6 | 44.6 |
| 29 | Turkiye | 24.8 | 6.8 | 18.9 | 20.1 | 53.4 |
| 30 | Austria | 24.6 | 10.2 | 37.7 | 2.2 | 48.2 |
| 31 | Greece | 23.9 | 13.1 | 20.3 | 5.6 | 56.7 |
| 32 | Indonesia | 23.2 | 19.2 | 13.9 | 4.9 | 54.7 |
| 33 | Philippines | 23.1 | 13.7 | 22.2 | 1.7 | 54.8 |
| 34 | Russia | 22.3 | 8.8 | 23.5 | 3.5 | 53.5 |
| 35 | Colombia | 20.2 | 7.9 | 15.8 | 0.7 | 56.5 |
| 36 | Czechia | 20.2 | 3.3 | 20.1 | 0.5 | 56.8 |
| 37 | Mexico | 20.1 | 8.4 | 13.5 | 2.3 | 56.2 |
| 38 | Poland | 20.1 | 8.4 | 12.5 | 3.9 | 55.4 |
| 39 | Egypt | 18.6 | 4.3 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 59.6 |
| 40 | Ireland | 17.8 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 2.7 | 53.3 |
| 41 | Romania | 16.7 | 4.1 | 6.5 | 0.2 | 55.9 |
| 42 | Nigeria | 15.8 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 54.4 |
| 43 | Ukraine | 15.1 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 55.7 |
| 44 | Argentina | 14.6 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 52.7 |
| 45 | Hungary | 5.1 | 6.8 | 11.9 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
Limitations & what the index can't tell you
This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 45 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).
The index measures the dimensions of financial-market depth that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.
Scoreboard (machine-readable data)
Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.
Methodology & verification
The Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 equal-weights 4 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 3 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.
Data dictionary
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| metric | string | financial_development_index |
| label | string | Country name |
| value | number | Composite score, 0–100 |
| unit | string | /100 |
| geography | string | Country |
Frequently asked questions
What is the Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026?
A composite ranking of 45 economies on financial-market depth, combining 4 World Bank dimensions (Market cap, Credit, Liquidity, FDI), each normalised 0–100 and equal-weighted. It is Affärslivet's own, transparent index.
Which country ranks first?
United States leads with 70.4/100. Top five: United States, China, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland.
Where does Sweden rank?
Sweden ranks — of 45 with None/100, strongest on credit to business.
How is it calculated?
Each of 4 World Bank indicators is min-max normalised 0–100 (lower-is-better dimensions inverted), then equal-weighted into a mean. Minimum 3 dimensions required. Fully documented and reproducible.
Is this an official index?
No — it is Affärslivet's own composite, built transparently from official World Bank data. It is not a World Bank, IMF, UN or WEF index.
Can I download the data?
Yes — the full ranking with per-dimension scores is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0, free to reuse with attribution to Affärslivet.
Which countries rank in the top 5 of the Financial Development Index?
The top five are United States, China, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland, based on the Financial Development Index (Affärslivet, 2026-08-01).
How many countries are ranked in the Financial Development Index?
45 economies are included in the Financial Development Index (2026-08-01). Full data is free to download as CSV or JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Glossary
- Composite index
- A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 4 normalised dimensions. ↗
- Min-max normalisation
- Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted. ↗
- Stock market size
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series CM.MKT.LCAP.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Credit to business
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Market liquidity
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series CM.MKT.TRAD.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
- Foreign capital
- Dimension of the index — World Bank series BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗
Embed & cite this report
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Embed the live-updating widget on your site, or cite the report directly — always with attribution to Affärslivet.
Embed (HTML) — auto-updating
<iframe src="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/embed/financial-development-index" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #e3e3e6" title="Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026 — Affärslivet" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font:12px sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/financial-development-index">Affärslivet</a></p>
APA
Affärslivet Research. (2026). Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026. Affärslivet. Version 1.0. https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/financial-development-index
MLA
Affärslivet Research. "Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026." Affärslivet, 2026-07-01, https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/financial-development-index.
BibTeX
@techreport{affarslivet_financial_development_index,
title = {Affärslivet Financial Development Index 2026},
author = {{Affärslivet Research}},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 1.0},
url = {https://xn--affrslivet-s5a.com/en/reports/financial-development-index}
} License CC BY 4.0 — free to cite, embed and republish with attribution to Affärslivet. Data also as CSV / JSON.