Affärslivet Economic Health Index 2026

Executive summary

The Affärslivet Economic Health Index 2026 ranks 48 economies on economic health by combining 5 equal-weighted dimensions, each normalised to a 0–100 scale. It deliberately excludes the level of income, so emerging and advanced economies compete on the same terms: is the economy in good shape right now? Ireland leads with 91.3/100; Sweden ranks 20th of 48 with 51.6/100. This is Affärslivet's own composite — fully transparent: every input is an official World Bank series with a source URL, and the method below is reproducible. The complete ranking with per-dimension scores is downloadable as CSV and JSON under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Key findings

The index — top economies

The chart shows the 15 highest-scoring economies (Sweden highlighted); scores are the equal-weighted mean of 5 dimensions, each normalised 0–100 across the 48 ranked economies.

Sweden, dimension by dimension

Sweden ranks 20th of 48 overall (51.6/100). Its normalised score and world rank on each dimension are below — a map of where the Swedish economic health is genuinely strong and where it lags.

Sweden's profile is relatively lopsided (a 64-point spread between its best and weakest dimension), scoring highest on jobs and lowest on growth.

Who leads each dimension

No single economy tops every dimension — the overall winner (Ireland) leads by being strong across the board (a 23-point spread across its dimensions). This table shows the world leader on each individual dimension of the index.

Regional patterns

Median composite score by world region reveals where economic health concentrates. Asia-Pacific leads on the median measure. Regional medians tell a story the country ranking alone can hide — whether strength is broad across a region or driven by one or two standouts.

What the index reveals

What the data says: Ireland leads with 91.3/100, 2.0× the median score of 45.4. The spread across the 48 ranked economies shows economic health is concentrated among a clear top tier, and — because the index equal-weights several dimensions — the leaders got there by being strong across the board, not on one metric alone.

For Sweden, the index indicates a middling position on economic health: 20th of 48 (51.6/100), strongest on jobs and with most room to improve on growth.

Top 5 vs bottom 5

The five highest- and five lowest-scoring economies on the Affärslivet Economic Health Index 2026 side by side — the clearest snapshot of the range across the 48 ranked economies.

How the index is built

The Affärslivet Economic Health Index measures the underlying soundness of an economy — not how rich it is, but how well-balanced: growing, with low unemployment, manageable public debt, a healthy external position and solid national saving.

Each dimension is min-max normalised across all economies with data (lowest = 0, highest = 100); dimensions where lower is better (e.g. unemployment, debt, inequality) are inverted so a higher score always means better. The composite is the equal-weighted mean of the dimensions an economy reports; a minimum of 4 is required to be ranked. Equal weighting is a deliberate, transparent choice.

Full ranking — 48 economies

Complete ranking with composite score and each economy's normalised (0–100) score per dimension.

Limitations & what the index can't tell you

This is a composite, and composites make choices. Scores are relative to the 48 ranked economies, so they shift as the field changes, not only as a country improves. Each dimension uses the most recent World Bank year available, and reporting lags differ across countries. Equal weighting is deliberate but not neutral — a differently weighted index would reorder the middle of the table (the top and bottom are robust).

The index measures the dimensions of economic health that official data captures; it is not a verdict on quality of life, policy or outcomes beyond them. We publish the full method and data precisely so others can reweight, extend or challenge it — reproducibility is the point.

Scoreboard (machine-readable data)

Every headline indicator with its value, period, source and confidence. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0.

↓ CSV · ↓ JSON

Methodology & verification

The Affärslivet Economic Health Index 2026 equal-weights 5 World Bank dimensions, each min-max normalised to 0–100 (dimensions where lower is better are inverted). The composite is the mean of the dimensions an economy reports; at least 4 are required. Scores are relative to the ranked set and shift as peer data updates. Every input is an official World Bank series (compiled from the IMF, WHO, UNESCO and national sources) with a source URL; nothing is estimated. This is Affärslivet's own composite — transparent and reproducible, not an official World Bank, IMF or UN index. Confidence: Medium-High.

Data dictionary

Frequently asked questions

Glossary

Composite index

A single score combining several indicators, here the equal-weighted mean of 5 normalised dimensions. ↗

Min-max normalisation

Rescaling so the lowest value becomes 0 and the highest 100, making different indicators comparable; 'lower is better' dimensions are inverted. ↗

Growth

Dimension of the index — World Bank series NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG (higher is better). ↗

Jobs

Dimension of the index — World Bank series SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS (lower is better). ↗

Fiscal

Dimension of the index — World Bank series GC.DOD.TOTL.GD.ZS (lower is better). ↗

External balance

Dimension of the index — World Bank series BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS (higher is better). ↗

Sources

• World Bank Open Data — all dimensions
• World Bank — Growth
• World Bank — Jobs
• World Bank — Fiscal
• World Bank — External balance
• World Bank — Saving
• Affärslivet — Sweden Economic Indicators

Related reports & data

• Business Climate Index
• Economic Health Index
• Prosperity Index
• Richest Countries in the World
• Sweden Economic Indicators